Header menu link for other important links
X
Evolution of the flow structures in an elevated jet in crossflow
Published in American Institute of Physics Inc.
2020
Volume: 32
   
Issue: 1
Abstract
The characteristic flow features of an elevated square jet in crossflow (EJICF) are studied numerically using large eddy simulation. The effect of jet to crossflow velocity ratio, also called velocity ratio (VR), on the flow field of an elevated jet in crossflow (EJICF) is investigated. All the computations are carried out at a Reynolds number (Re) of 20 000, based on the outer width of the stack (d) and free stream crossflow velocity (U∞), for four different velocity ratios (VR), namely, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. The stack used in this study has an aspect ratio h/d = 7. The shear-improved Smagorinsky model has been used to account for the subgrid scale stress while solving the filtered three-dimensional unsteady Navier-Stokes equations. The modes of shedding in the stack wake are analyzed using both instantaneous and phase-averaged data. It is found that at a low jet to crossflow velocity ratio (VR = 0.5), the stack wake exhibits two different modes of shedding, symmetric and antisymmetric, similar to the wake of a wall mounted finite-size cylinder. At higher velocity ratios (VR ≥ 1), the stack wake shows the presence of only antisymmetric modes of shedding. It is also found that velocity ratio (VR) has a profound effect on the source of vorticity of the jet shear layer structures near the upwind side. At VR = 0.5, the upstream sides of the jet shear layer structures are found to draw their vortices from the outer surface of the stack boundary layer. At higher VR, they seem to be fed by the vorticity of the boundary layer developed on the inner wall surface of the stack. Both jet vortices and stack wake vortices are found to be present in the jet wake, and the shedding frequency of both the jet wake and the stack wake is found to be same. The spatial evolution of the counter-rotating vortex pair in the case of an EJICF is found to be similar to that of a JICF. © 2020 Author(s).
About the journal
JournalData powered by TypesetPhysics of Fluids
PublisherData powered by TypesetAmerican Institute of Physics Inc.
ISSN10706631